Chrysler Town & Country 2001 vs Mazda MPV 1999
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.3 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 174 HP | 122 HP | |
| Torque: | 278 NM | 175 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 14.2 seconds | |
| Chrysler Town & Country engine produces 52 HP more power than Mazda MPV, whereas torque is 103 NM more than Mazda MPV. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.8 | 10.1 | |
|
The Mazda MPV is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chrysler Town & Country consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda MPV, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Town & Country could require 105 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 76 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 690 km in combined cycle | |
| 830 km on highway | 810 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.09 m | 4.75 m | |
| Width: | 2.00 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.74 m | |
|
Chrysler Town & Country is larger. Chrysler Town & Country is 34 cm longer than the Mazda MPV, 17 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Town & Country is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 153 litres | 294 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 153 litres | 294 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
4754 litres | 1600 litres | |
| In 7-seat version Mazda MPV has more luggage space (by 141 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Chrysler Town & Country (by 3154 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`230 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Town & Country has
|
Mazda MPV has
| |