Chrysler Town & Country 2001 vs Kia Carnival 2002
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.3 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 174 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 278 NM | 224 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 15.5 seconds | |
| Chrysler Town & Country engine produces 24 HP more power than Kia Carnival, whereas torque is 54 NM more than Kia Carnival. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.8 | 12.4 | |
|
The Chrysler Town & Country is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chrysler Town & Country consumes 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Kia Carnival, which means that by driving the Chrysler Town & Country over 15,000 km in a year you can save 240 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 76 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 600 km in combined cycle | |
| 830 km on highway | 750 km on highway | ||
| Chrysler Town & Country gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.09 m | 4.93 m | |
| Width: | 2.00 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.74 m | |
|
Chrysler Town & Country is larger. Chrysler Town & Country is 17 cm longer than the Kia Carnival, 10 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Town & Country is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 153 litres | 302 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 153 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 302 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
4754 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 13 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`555 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Town & Country has
|
Kia Carnival has
| |