Chrysler Town & Country 2008 vs Chrysler Grand Voyager 2011
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.3 Petrol | 3.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 177 HP | 172 HP | |
| Torque: | 278 NM | 278 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Chrysler Town & Country engine produces 5 HP more power than Chrysler Grand Voyager, the torque is the same for both cars. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.5 | 11.3 | |
|
The Chrysler Grand Voyager is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chrysler Town & Country consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Grand Voyager, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Town & Country could require 180 litres more fuel. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.15 m | 5.10 m | |
| Width: | 2.00 m | 2.00 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.80 m | |
|
Chrysler Town & Country is larger, but lower. Chrysler Town & Country is 5 cm longer than the Chrysler Grand Voyager, width is practically the same , while the height of Chrysler Town & Country is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 930 litres | 748 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 930 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 748 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
2340 litres | 4550 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Chrysler Grand Voyager (by 2210 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight: | 2`585 kg | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 10 000 | 8600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager has
| |