Chrysler Stratus 1996 vs Volvo C70 1999
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 161 HP | 193 HP | |
| Torque: | 218 NM | 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.1 seconds | 8.5 seconds | |
|
Volvo C70 is a more dynamic driving. Chrysler Stratus engine produces 32 HP less power than Volvo C70, whereas torque is 52 NM less than Volvo C70. Due to the lower power, Chrysler Stratus reaches 100 km/h speed 3.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.5 | 9.5 | |
|
The Volvo C70 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chrysler Stratus consumes 2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo C70, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Stratus could require 300 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 68 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 520 km in combined cycle | 710 km in combined cycle | |
| 660 km on highway | 910 km on highway | ||
| Volvo C70 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.90 m | 4.72 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.43 m | |
| Chrysler Stratus is 18 cm longer than the Volvo C70, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Chrysler Stratus is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 260 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.2 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Stratus is 0.5 metres more than that of the Volvo C70, which means Chrysler Stratus can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`000 | 1`970 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 2200 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Stratus has
|
Volvo C70 has
| |