Chrysler Stratus 1996 vs SAAB 900 1994
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 161 HP | 170 HP | |
| Torque: | 218 NM | 227 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.1 seconds | 9.2 seconds | |
|
SAAB 900 is a more dynamic driving. Chrysler Stratus engine produces 9 HP less power than SAAB 900, whereas torque is 9 NM less than SAAB 900. Due to the lower power, Chrysler Stratus reaches 100 km/h speed 2.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.5 | 8.4 | |
|
The SAAB 900 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chrysler Stratus consumes 3.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the SAAB 900, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Stratus could require 465 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 68 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 520 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
| 660 km on highway | 950 km on highway | ||
| SAAB 900 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.90 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.44 m | |
|
Chrysler Stratus is larger, but lower. Chrysler Stratus is 26 cm longer than the SAAB 900, 7 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Stratus is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.2 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Stratus is 1.3 metres more than that of the SAAB 900, which means Chrysler Stratus can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`000 | 1`600 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
SAAB 900 has
| |