Chrysler Stratus 1996 vs Chrysler 300M 1998
| Body: | Cabrio | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.7 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 161 HP | 203 HP | |
| Torque: | 218 NM | 256 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.1 seconds | 10 seconds | |
|
Chrysler 300M is a more dynamic driving. Chrysler Stratus engine produces 42 HP less power than Chrysler 300M, whereas torque is 38 NM less than Chrysler 300M. Due to the lower power, Chrysler Stratus reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.5 | 10.5 | |
|
The Chrysler 300M is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chrysler Stratus consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler 300M, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Stratus could require 150 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 64 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 520 km in combined cycle | 600 km in combined cycle | |
| 660 km on highway | 800 km on highway | ||
| Chrysler 300M gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.90 m | 5.00 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.92 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Chrysler Stratus is smaller. Chrysler Stratus is 10 cm shorter than the Chrysler 300M, 14 cm narrower, while the height of Chrysler Stratus is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 530 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 530 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.2 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Stratus is 0.7 metres more than that of the Chrysler 300M, which means Chrysler Stratus can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`000 | 2`120 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Chrysler 300M has
| |