Chrysler Stratus 1995 vs Rover 75 1999
Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 161 HP | 116 HP | |
Torque: | 218 NM | 260 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 11.7 seconds | |
Chrysler Stratus is more dynamic to drive. Chrysler Stratus engine produces 45 HP more power than Rover 75, but torque is 42 NM less than Rover 75. Thanks to more power Chrysler Stratus reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.7 | 5.8 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 10.8 l/100km | 6.3 l/100km | |
The Rover 75 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Chrysler Stratus consumes 4.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Rover 75, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Stratus could require 735 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chrysler Stratus consumes 4.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Rover 75. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 65 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 560 km in combined cycle | 1120 km in combined cycle | |
740 km on highway | 1380 km on highway | ||
550 km with real consumption | 1030 km with real consumption | ||
Rover 75 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.75 m | 4.75 m | |
Width: | 1.82 m | 1.78 m | |
Height: | 1.37 m | 1.43 m | |
Chrysler Stratus and Rover 75 are practically the same length. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 432 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 432 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.4 meters | |
The turning circle of the Chrysler Stratus is 0.4 metres less than that of the Rover 75, which means Chrysler Stratus can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`200 | 2`030 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 600 | 1800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Stratus has
|
Rover 75 has
| |