Chrysler Stratus 1995 vs Mazda 626 1995
Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 161 HP | 117 HP | |
Torque: | 218 NM | 173 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 10.7 seconds | |
Chrysler Stratus is more dynamic to drive. Chrysler Stratus engine produces 44 HP more power than Mazda 626, whereas torque is 45 NM more than Mazda 626. Thanks to more power Chrysler Stratus reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.7 | 7.7 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 10.8 l/100km | 8.1 l/100km | |
The Mazda 626 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Chrysler Stratus consumes 3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 626, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Stratus could require 450 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chrysler Stratus consumes 2.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 626. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 560 km in combined cycle | 770 km in combined cycle | |
550 km with real consumption | 740 km with real consumption | ||
Mazda 626 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.75 m | 4.70 m | |
Width: | 1.82 m | 1.75 m | |
Height: | 1.37 m | 1.40 m | |
Chrysler Stratus is larger, but slightly lower. Chrysler Stratus is 5 cm longer than the Mazda 626, 7 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Stratus is 3 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 452 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.6 meters | |
The turning circle of the Chrysler Stratus is 0.4 metres more than that of the Mazda 626, which means Chrysler Stratus can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`200 | 1`645 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | above average | |
Average price (€): | 600 | 600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Stratus has
|
Mazda 626 has
| |