Chrysler Stratus 1995 vs Ford Scorpio 1996
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 161 HP | 147 HP | |
| Torque: | 218 NM | 202 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
|
Chrysler Stratus is more dynamic to drive. Chrysler Stratus engine produces 14 HP more power than Ford Scorpio, whereas torque is 16 NM more than Ford Scorpio. Thanks to more power Chrysler Stratus reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.7 | 10.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.8 l/100km | 11.2 l/100km | |
|
By specification Chrysler Stratus consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Scorpio, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Stratus could require 30 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Chrysler Stratus consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Scorpio. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 560 km in combined cycle | 660 km in combined cycle | |
| 740 km on highway | 840 km on highway | ||
| 550 km with real consumption | 620 km with real consumption | ||
| Ford Scorpio gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Chrysler Stratus) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Ford Scorpio) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.75 m | 4.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.37 m | 1.39 m | |
|
Chrysler Stratus is smaller. Chrysler Stratus is 7 cm shorter than the Ford Scorpio, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Chrysler Stratus is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Stratus is 0.6 metres more than that of the Ford Scorpio, which means Chrysler Stratus can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`200 | 1`850 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 600 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Stratus has
|
Ford Scorpio has
| |