Chrysler Stratus 1995 vs Ford Mondeo 2000
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 161 HP | 170 HP | |
| Torque: | 218 NM | 220 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 8.7 seconds | |
|
Ford Mondeo is a more dynamic driving. Chrysler Stratus engine produces 9 HP less power than Ford Mondeo, whereas torque is 2 NM less than Ford Mondeo. Due to the lower power, Chrysler Stratus reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.7 | 9.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.8 l/100km | 9.8 l/100km | |
|
The Ford Mondeo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Chrysler Stratus consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Mondeo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Stratus could require 120 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chrysler Stratus consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Mondeo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 59 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 560 km in combined cycle | 590 km in combined cycle | |
| 740 km on highway | 800 km on highway | ||
| 550 km with real consumption | 600 km with real consumption | ||
| Ford Mondeo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.75 m | 4.73 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.37 m | 1.43 m | |
|
Chrysler Stratus is larger, but lower. Chrysler Stratus is 2 cm longer than the Ford Mondeo, 1 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Stratus is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 500 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Stratus is 0.1 metres less than that of the Ford Mondeo. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`200 | 1`940 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 600 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Stratus has
|
Ford Mondeo has
| |