Chrysler Stratus 1995 vs Chrysler Neon 1997
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 161 HP | 133 HP | |
Torque: | 218 NM | 174 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 9.2 seconds | |
Chrysler Stratus engine produces 28 HP more power than Chrysler Neon, whereas torque is 44 NM more than Chrysler Neon. Despite the higher power, Chrysler Stratus reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.7 | 8.5 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 10.8 l/100km | 9.2 l/100km | |
The Chrysler Neon is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Chrysler Stratus consumes 2.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Neon, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Stratus could require 330 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chrysler Stratus consumes 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Neon. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 47 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 560 km in combined cycle | 550 km in combined cycle | |
740 km on highway | 710 km on highway | ||
550 km with real consumption | 510 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.75 m | 4.36 m | |
Width: | 1.82 m | 1.71 m | |
Height: | 1.37 m | 1.37 m | |
Chrysler Stratus is larger. Chrysler Stratus is 39 cm longer than the Chrysler Neon, 11 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 364 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.8 meters | |
The turning circle of the Chrysler Stratus is 0.2 metres more than that of the Chrysler Neon. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`200 | 1`600 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 600 | 600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Stratus has
|
Chrysler Neon has
| |