Chrysler Stratus 1995 vs Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution 1998
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 161 HP | 280 HP | |
| Torque: | 218 NM | 372.6 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Chrysler Stratus engine produces 119 HP less power than Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution, whereas torque is 154.6 NM less than Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.7 | 10.0 | |
|
The Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chrysler Stratus consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Stratus could require 105 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 560 km in combined cycle | 500 km in combined cycle | |
| Chrysler Stratus gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.75 m | 4.35 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.37 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Chrysler Stratus is larger, but lower. Chrysler Stratus is 40 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution, 5 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Stratus is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`200 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 600 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Stratus has
|
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution has
| |