Chrysler Stratus 1995 vs Ford Cougar 1998

 
Chrysler Stratus
1995 - 2001
Ford Cougar
1998 - 2001
Body: SedanCoupe
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.5 Petrol2.5 Petrol

Performance

Power: 161 HP170 HP
Torque: 218 NM220 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.5 seconds10.4 seconds
Chrysler Stratus engine produces 9 HP less power than Ford Cougar, whereas torque is 2 NM less than Ford Cougar. Due to the lower power, Chrysler Stratus reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 10.79.6
Real fuel consumption: 10.8 l/100km10.5 l/100km
The Ford Cougar is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Chrysler Stratus consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Cougar, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Stratus could require 165 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chrysler Stratus consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Cougar.
Fuel tank capacity: 60 litres60 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 560 km in combined cycle620 km in combined cycle
740 km on highway830 km on highway
550 km with real consumption570 km with real consumption
Ford Cougar gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.75 m4.70 m
Width: 1.82 m1.77 m
Height: 1.37 m1.32 m
Chrysler Stratus is larger.
Chrysler Stratus is 5 cm longer than the Ford Cougar, 5 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Stratus is 5 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: no data430 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data930 litres
Turning diameter: 11 meters10.9 meters
The turning circle of the Chrysler Stratus is 0.1 metres more than that of the Ford Cougar.
Gross weight (kg): 1`2001`825
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 6001600
Pros and Cons: Chrysler Stratus has
  • lower price
Ford Cougar has
  • more power
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv