Chrysler Stratus 1996 vs SAAB 900 1994
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.5 | 2.0 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 131 - 161 HP | 130 - 185 HP | |
| Torque: | 174 - 218 NM | 177 - 263 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.1 - 14.4 seconds | 8.5 - 12.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.3 - 11.5 | 8.4 - 11.3 | |
|
Chrysler Stratus petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than SAAB 900. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.90 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.44 m | |
|
Chrysler Stratus is larger, but lower. Chrysler Stratus is 26 cm longer than the SAAB 900, 7 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Stratus is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.2 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Stratus is 1.3 metres more than that of the SAAB 900, which means Chrysler Stratus can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`000 | ~ 1`600 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
SAAB 900 has
| |