Chrysler Stratus 1996 vs Chrysler Stratus 1995
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Cabrio | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.5 | 2.0 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 131 - 161 HP | 131 - 161 HP | |
| Torque: | 174 - 218 NM | 174 - 218 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.1 - 14.4 seconds | 10.5 - 10.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.3 - 11.5 | 8.2 - 10.7 | |
|
Chrysler Stratus 1996 petrol engines consumes on average 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than Chrysler Stratus 1995. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.90 m | 4.75 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.37 m | |
| Chrysler Stratus 1996 is 15 cm longer than the Chrysler Stratus 1995, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Chrysler Stratus 1996 is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.2 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Stratus 1996 is 1.2 metres more than that of the Chrysler Stratus 1995, which means Chrysler Stratus 1996 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`000 | ~ 1`200 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Chrysler Stratus has
| |