Chrysler Stratus 1996 vs Chrysler 300M 1998
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Body: | Cabrio | Sedan | |
---|---|---|---|
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Automatic | |
Chrysler Stratus is available with both manual and automatic gearboxes, whereas Chrysler 300M is available only with automatic gearbox. | |||
Engines: | 2.0 - 2.5 | 2.7 - 3.5 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 131 - 161 HP | 203 - 254 HP | |
Torque: | 174 - 218 NM | 256 - 340 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.1 - 14.4 seconds | 8.8 - 10 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.3 - 11.5 | 10.5 - 10.7 | |
Chrysler Stratus petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than Chrysler 300M. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.90 m | 5.00 m | |
Width: | 1.78 m | 1.92 m | |
Height: | 1.39 m | 1.42 m | |
Chrysler Stratus is smaller. Chrysler Stratus is 10 cm shorter than the Chrysler 300M, 14 cm narrower, while the height of Chrysler Stratus is 3 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 530 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 530 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 12.2 meters | 11.5 meters | |
The turning circle of the Chrysler Stratus is 0.7 metres more than that of the Chrysler 300M, which means Chrysler Stratus can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`000 | ~ 2`120 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 2000 | 1400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Stratus has
|
Chrysler 300M has
| |