Chrysler Stratus 1996 vs Chevrolet Camaro 1998
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Chrysler Stratus is available with front wheel drive, while Chevrolet Camaro can be equipped with rear wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.5 | 3.8 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 131 - 161 HP | 193 HP | |
| Torque: | 174 - 218 NM | 305 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.1 - 14.4 seconds | 8.5 - 8.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.3 - 11.5 | 11.7 - 12.4 | |
|
Chrysler Stratus petrol engines consumes on average 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than Chevrolet Camaro. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.90 m | 4.91 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.30 m | |
|
Chrysler Stratus is smaller, but higher. Chrysler Stratus is 1 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Camaro, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Chrysler Stratus is 9 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.2 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Stratus is 0.6 metres more than that of the Chevrolet Camaro, which means Chrysler Stratus can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`000 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 3000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Stratus has
|
| |