Chrysler Stratus 1995 vs Chrysler Neon 1994
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.5 | 1.8 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 131 - 161 HP | 115 - 133 HP | |
| Torque: | 174 - 218 NM | 152 - 175 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 - 10.9 seconds | 8.8 - 11.1 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.2 - 10.7 | 8.0 - 8.5 | |
|
Chrysler Stratus petrol engines consumes on average 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Chrysler Neon. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.75 m | 4.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.37 m | 1.37 m | |
|
Chrysler Stratus is larger, but slightly lower. Chrysler Stratus is 39 cm longer than the Chrysler Neon, 11 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 364 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Stratus is 0.1 metres more than that of the Chrysler Neon. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`200 | ~ 1`610 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 600 | 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Chrysler Neon has
| |