Chrysler Stratus 1995 vs Ford Mustang 1994
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Sedan | Coupe | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Chrysler Stratus is available with front wheel drive, while Ford Mustang can be equipped with rear wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.5 | 3.8 - 4.6 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 131 - 161 HP | 147 - 305 HP | |
| Torque: | 174 - 218 NM | 292 - 407 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 - 10.9 seconds | 9.3 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.2 - 10.7 | 9.3 - 11.3 | |
|
Chrysler Stratus petrol engines consumes on average 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than Ford Mustang. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.75 m | 4.62 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.37 m | 1.34 m | |
| Chrysler Stratus is 13 cm longer than the Ford Mustang, width is practically the same , while the height of Chrysler Stratus is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Stratus is 0.7 metres less than that of the Ford Mustang, which means Chrysler Stratus can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`200 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 600 | 6600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Stratus has
|
| |