Chrysler Stratus 1995 vs Ford Cougar 1998
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Sedan | Coupe | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.5 | 2.0 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 131 - 161 HP | 130 - 205 HP | |
| Torque: | 174 - 218 NM | 176 - 234 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 - 10.9 seconds | 7.8 - 10.4 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.2 - 10.7 | 8.3 - 10.2 | |
|
Chrysler Stratus petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Ford Cougar. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.75 m | 4.70 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.37 m | 1.32 m | |
|
Chrysler Stratus is larger. Chrysler Stratus is 5 cm longer than the Ford Cougar, 5 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Stratus is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 930 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Stratus is 0.1 metres more than that of the Ford Cougar. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`200 | ~ 1`799 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 600 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Stratus has
|
| |