Chrysler Stratus 1995 vs Chrysler Stratus 1996
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Body: | Sedan | Cabrio | |
---|---|---|---|
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
Engines: | 2.0 - 2.5 | 2.0 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 131 - 161 HP | 131 - 161 HP | |
Torque: | 174 - 218 NM | 174 - 218 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 - 10.9 seconds | 12.1 - 14.4 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.2 - 10.7 | 9.3 - 11.5 | |
Chrysler Stratus 1995 petrol engines consumes on average 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than Chrysler Stratus 1996. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.75 m | 4.90 m | |
Width: | 1.82 m | 1.78 m | |
Height: | 1.37 m | 1.39 m | |
Chrysler Stratus 1995 is 15 cm shorter than the Chrysler Stratus 1996, 4 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Stratus 1995 is 2 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 12.2 meters | |
The turning circle of the Chrysler Stratus 1995 is 1.2 metres less than that of the Chrysler Stratus 1996, which means Chrysler Stratus 1995 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`200 | ~ 1`000 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 600 | 2000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Stratus has
|
| |