Chrysler Sebring 2006 vs SAAB 9-3 2003
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 141 HP | 150 HP | |
Torque: | 188 NM | 240 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.3 seconds | 10 seconds | |
SAAB 9-3 is a more dynamic driving. Chrysler Sebring engine produces 9 HP less power than SAAB 9-3, whereas torque is 52 NM less than SAAB 9-3. Due to the lower power, Chrysler Sebring reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.1 | 8.6 | |
The SAAB 9-3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chrysler Sebring consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the SAAB 9-3, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Sebring could require 75 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 63 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 730 km in combined cycle | |
SAAB 9-3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.92 m | 4.64 m | |
Width: | 1.76 m | 1.76 m | |
Height: | 1.40 m | 1.43 m | |
Chrysler Sebring is 28 cm longer than the SAAB 9-3, width is practically the same , while the height of Chrysler Sebring is 3 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 320 litres | 235 litres | |
Chrysler Sebring has more luggage capacity. Chrysler Sebring has 85 litres more trunk space than the SAAB 9-3. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`040 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | above average | |
Average price (€): | 3200 | 3800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Sebring has
|
SAAB 9-3 has
| |