Chrysler Sebring 2006 vs Chrysler PT Cruiser 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 141 HP | 223 HP | |
| Torque: | 188 NM | 332 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.3 seconds | 7.6 seconds | |
|
Chrysler PT Cruiser is a more dynamic driving. Chrysler Sebring engine produces 82 HP less power than Chrysler PT Cruiser, whereas torque is 144 NM less than Chrysler PT Cruiser. Due to the lower power, Chrysler Sebring reaches 100 km/h speed 4.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.1 | 9.9 | |
|
The Chrysler Sebring is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chrysler Sebring consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler PT Cruiser, which means that by driving the Chrysler Sebring over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 57 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 570 km in combined cycle | |
| Chrysler Sebring gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.92 m | 4.29 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.54 m | |
|
Chrysler Sebring is larger, but lower. Chrysler Sebring is 63 cm longer than the Chrysler PT Cruiser, 1 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Sebring is 14 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 320 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Sebring is 1 metres less than that of the Chrysler PT Cruiser, which means Chrysler Sebring can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 3200 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Sebring has
|
Chrysler PT Cruiser has
| |