Chrysler Sebring 2006 vs Mercedes CLK 2003
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 141 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 188 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.3 seconds | 9.8 seconds | |
|
Mercedes CLK is a more dynamic driving. Chrysler Sebring engine produces 22 HP less power than Mercedes CLK, whereas torque is 52 NM less than Mercedes CLK. Due to the lower power, Chrysler Sebring reaches 100 km/h speed 2.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.1 | 9.1 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 62 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 680 km in combined cycle | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Chrysler Sebring) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Mercedes CLK) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
| Mercedes CLK 2003 1.8 engine: The most notable issue with this engine is the sticking of exhaust valves due to carbon buildup. Another significant problem is the unreliable timing chain, which can stretch by 100,000 km. Early symptoms of a ... More about Mercedes CLK 2003 1.8 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.92 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.41 m | |
|
Chrysler Sebring is larger, but slightly lower. Chrysler Sebring is 28 cm longer than the Mercedes CLK, 2 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Sebring is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 320 litres | 276 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 390 litres | |
|
Chrysler Sebring has more luggage capacity. Chrysler Sebring has 44 litres more trunk space than the Mercedes CLK. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Sebring is 0.2 metres more than that of the Mercedes CLK. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`135 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 3200 | 7400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Sebring has
|
Mercedes CLK has
| |