Chrysler Sebring 2003 vs Renault Megane 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 141 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 188 NM | 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.3 seconds | 8.7 seconds | |
|
Renault Megane is a more dynamic driving. Chrysler Sebring engine produces 22 HP less power than Renault Megane, whereas torque is 82 NM less than Renault Megane. Due to the lower power, Chrysler Sebring reaches 100 km/h speed 3.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.1 | 7.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.5 l/100km | 8.3 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Megane is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Chrysler Sebring consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Megane, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Sebring could require 180 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chrysler Sebring consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Megane. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 750 km in combined cycle | |
| 880 km on highway | 980 km on highway | ||
| 630 km with real consumption | 720 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Megane gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Chrysler PT Cruiser, Mitsubishi Eclipse | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Renault Grand Espace | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Megane might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Renault Megane 2004 2.0 engine: This engine offers a respectable lifespan for a turbocharged motor but comes with several recurring issues that demand attention. One common problem is oil consumption, which can result from hardened valve seals or, in later ... More about Renault Megane 2004 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.92 m | 4.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.40 m | |
| Chrysler Sebring is 56 cm longer than the Renault Megane, 2 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 320 litres | 190 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 490 litres | |
|
Chrysler Sebring has more luggage capacity. Chrysler Sebring has 130 litres more trunk space than the Renault Megane. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Sebring is 0.8 metres more than that of the Renault Megane, which means Chrysler Sebring can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Power steering: | Hydraulic power steering | Electric power steering | |
| Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`990 | 1`870 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 3200 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Sebring has
|
Renault Megane has
| |