Chrysler Sebring 2003 vs Renault Megane 2003

 
Chrysler Sebring
2003 - 2006
Renault Megane
2003 - 2006
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Petrol1.6 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming belt

Performance

Power: 141 HP115 HP
Torque: 188 NM152 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12.3 seconds11.8 seconds
Chrysler Sebring engine produces 26 HP more power than Renault Megane, whereas torque is 36 NM more than Renault Megane. Despite the higher power, Chrysler Sebring reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 9.16.9
Real fuel consumption: 9.5 l/100km7.6 l/100km
The Renault Megane is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Chrysler Sebring consumes 2.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Megane, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Sebring could require 330 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chrysler Sebring consumes 1.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Megane.
Fuel tank capacity: 60 litres60 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 650 km in combined cycle860 km in combined cycle
880 km on highway1050 km on highway
630 km with real consumption780 km with real consumption
Renault Megane gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 370'000 km420'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Renault Megane engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 11 years26 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Chrysler PT Cruiser, Mitsubishi EclipseInstalled on at least 7 other car models, including Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Renault Clio, Dacia Duster
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Megane might be a better choice in this respect.
Hydraulic tappets: yesno
The Chrysler Sebring engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure.
Renault Megane 2003 1.6 engine: The engine is very robust and long-lived, up to half a million kilometres, and can suffer minor damage, but overall it is quite reliable. Fuel consumption is relatively high for these engines, but they are not ...  More about Renault Megane 2003 1.6 engine 

Dimensions

Length: 4.92 m4.36 m
Width: 1.76 m1.78 m
Height: 1.40 m1.40 m
Chrysler Sebring is 56 cm longer than the Renault Megane, 2 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 320 litres190 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data490 litres
Chrysler Sebring has more luggage capacity.
Chrysler Sebring has 130 litres more trunk space than the Renault Megane.
Turning diameter: 11 meters10.2 meters
The turning circle of the Chrysler Sebring is 0.8 metres more than that of the Renault Megane, which means Chrysler Sebring can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Power steering: Hydraulic power steeringElectric power steering
Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering.
Gross weight (kg): 1`9901`775
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
below average
Average price (€): 32001800
Pros and Cons: Chrysler Sebring has
  • more power
  • roomier boot
  • hydraulic power steering
Renault Megane has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • better manoeuvrability
  • electric power steering
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv