Chrysler Sebring 2003 vs Chrysler PT Cruiser 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 141 HP | 223 HP | |
| Torque: | 188 NM | 332 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.3 seconds | 7.6 seconds | |
|
Chrysler PT Cruiser is a more dynamic driving. Chrysler Sebring engine produces 82 HP less power than Chrysler PT Cruiser, whereas torque is 144 NM less than Chrysler PT Cruiser. Due to the lower power, Chrysler Sebring reaches 100 km/h speed 4.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.1 | 9.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.5 l/100km | 10.8 l/100km | |
|
The Chrysler Sebring is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Chrysler Sebring consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler PT Cruiser, which means that by driving the Chrysler Sebring over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chrysler Sebring consumes 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler PT Cruiser. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 57 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 570 km in combined cycle | |
| 880 km on highway | 690 km on highway | ||
| 630 km with real consumption | 520 km with real consumption | ||
| Chrysler Sebring gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 370'000 km | 280'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Chrysler Sebring engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Chrysler PT Cruiser, Mitsubishi Eclipse | Used also on Dodge Neon | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Chrysler Sebring might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.92 m | 4.29 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.54 m | |
|
Chrysler Sebring is larger, but lower. Chrysler Sebring is 63 cm longer than the Chrysler PT Cruiser, 1 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Sebring is 14 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 320 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Sebring is 1 metres less than that of the Chrysler PT Cruiser, which means Chrysler Sebring can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`990 | 1`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 3200 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Sebring has
|
Chrysler PT Cruiser has
| |