Chrysler Sebring 2003 vs Mercedes SLK 2004

 
Chrysler Sebring
2003 - 2006
Mercedes SLK
2004 - 2008
Gearbox: ManualAutomatic
Engine: 2.0 Petrol1.8 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming chain
Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors.

Performance

Power: 141 HP163 HP
Torque: 188 NM240 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12.3 seconds8.3 seconds
Mercedes SLK is a more dynamic driving.
Chrysler Sebring engine produces 22 HP less power than Mercedes SLK, whereas torque is 52 NM less than Mercedes SLK. Due to the lower power, Chrysler Sebring reaches 100 km/h speed 4 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 9.18.8
Real fuel consumption: 9.5 l/100km9.1 l/100km
By specification Chrysler Sebring consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes SLK, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Sebring could require 45 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chrysler Sebring consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes SLK.
Fuel tank capacity: 60 litres70 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 650 km in combined cycle790 km in combined cycle
880 km on highway1040 km on highway
630 km with real consumption760 km with real consumption
Mercedes SLK gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD)Rear wheel drive (RWD)
Front-wheel drive cars (Chrysler Sebring) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Mercedes SLK) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 370'000 km440'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mercedes SLK engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 11 years13 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Chrysler PT Cruiser, Mitsubishi EclipseInstalled on at least 3 other car models, including Mercedes C klase, Mercedes E klase, Mercedes CLK
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mercedes SLK might be a better choice in this respect.
Mercedes SLK 2004 1.8 engine: The most notable issue with this engine is the sticking of exhaust valves due to carbon buildup. Another significant problem is the unreliable timing chain, which can stretch by 100,000 km. Early symptoms of a ...  More about Mercedes SLK 2004 1.8 engine 

Dimensions

Length: 4.92 m4.09 m
Width: 1.76 m1.79 m
Height: 1.40 m1.30 m
Chrysler Sebring is 83 cm longer than the Mercedes SLK, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Chrysler Sebring is 10 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 320 litres208 litres
Chrysler Sebring has more luggage capacity.
Chrysler Sebring has 112 litres more trunk space than the Mercedes SLK.
Turning diameter: 11 meters10.5 meters
The turning circle of the Chrysler Sebring is 0.5 metres more than that of the Mercedes SLK, which means Chrysler Sebring can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`9901`705
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
high
Average price (€): 32007200
Pros and Cons: Chrysler Sebring has
  • timing belt engine
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Mercedes SLK has
  • timing chain engine
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • longer expected engine lifespan
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv