Chrysler Sebring 2007 vs Volvo C70 2006
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.7 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 186 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 256 NM | 220 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.3 seconds | 11 seconds | |
|
Chrysler Sebring is more dynamic to drive. Chrysler Sebring engine produces 46 HP more power than Volvo C70, whereas torque is 36 NM more than Volvo C70. Thanks to more power Chrysler Sebring reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.5 | 8.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.2 l/100km | 9.2 l/100km | |
|
The Volvo C70 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Chrysler Sebring consumes 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo C70, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Sebring could require 240 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chrysler Sebring consumes 2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo C70. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 62 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 600 km in combined cycle | 690 km in combined cycle | |
| 830 km on highway | 920 km on highway | ||
| 570 km with real consumption | 670 km with real consumption | ||
| Volvo C70 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Volvo C70 2006 2.4 engine: The strengths of this engine lie in its durable components, long lifespan, reliability in everyday use, and substantial power reserves.
However, there are notable weaknesses. Early models were equipped ... More about Volvo C70 2006 2.4 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.93 m | 4.58 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.40 m | |
|
Chrysler Sebring is larger. Chrysler Sebring is 35 cm longer than the Volvo C70, 2 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Sebring is 10 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 193 litres | 200 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 404 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Chrysler Sebring has 7 litres less trunk space than the Volvo C70. This could mean that the Chrysler Sebring uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.13 meters | 12.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Sebring is 1.57 metres less than that of the Volvo C70, which means Chrysler Sebring can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`175 | 2`090 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 3200 | 4800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Sebring has
|
Volvo C70 has
| |