Chrysler Sebring 2007 vs Volkswagen EOS 2006
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.7 Petrol | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 186 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 256 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.3 seconds | 10.4 seconds | |
| Chrysler Sebring engine produces 46 HP more power than Volkswagen EOS, but torque is 64 NM less than Volkswagen EOS. Thanks to more power Chrysler Sebring reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.5 | 6.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.2 l/100km | 6.2 l/100km | |
|
The Volkswagen EOS is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Chrysler Sebring consumes 4.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen EOS, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Sebring could require 660 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chrysler Sebring consumes 5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen EOS. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 600 km in combined cycle | 900 km in combined cycle | |
| 830 km on highway | 1100 km on highway | ||
| 570 km with real consumption | 880 km with real consumption | ||
| Volkswagen EOS gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.93 m | 4.41 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.44 m | |
|
Chrysler Sebring is larger. Chrysler Sebring is 52 cm longer than the Volkswagen EOS, 5 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Sebring is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 193 litres | 205 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 380 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Chrysler Sebring has 12 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen EOS. This could mean that the Chrysler Sebring uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.13 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Sebring is 0.23 metres more than that of the Volkswagen EOS. | |||
| Power steering: | Hydraulic power steering | Electric power steering | |
| Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`175 | 2`010 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 3000 | 5000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Sebring has
|
Volkswagen EOS has
| |