Chrysler Sebring 1994 vs Mitsubishi 3000 GT 1995
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 3.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 166 HP | 286 HP | |
| Torque: | 230 NM | 407 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 5.9 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi 3000 GT is a more dynamic driving. Chrysler Sebring engine produces 120 HP less power than Mitsubishi 3000 GT, whereas torque is 177 NM less than Mitsubishi 3000 GT. Due to the lower power, Chrysler Sebring reaches 100 km/h speed 4.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.5 | 12.4 | |
|
The Chrysler Sebring is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chrysler Sebring consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi 3000 GT, which means that by driving the Chrysler Sebring over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 520 km in combined cycle | 600 km in combined cycle | |
| 660 km on highway | 780 km on highway | ||
| Mitsubishi 3000 GT gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.76 m | 4.57 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.30 m | 1.28 m | |
| Chrysler Sebring is 19 cm longer than the Mitsubishi 3000 GT, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Chrysler Sebring is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 370 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.4 meters | |
| Gross weight: | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1800 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Sebring has
|
Mitsubishi 3000 GT has
| |