Chrysler Sebring 1994 vs Honda Prelude 1997
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.2 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 166 HP | 185 HP | |
Torque: | 230 NM | 206 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | n/a seconds | |
Chrysler Sebring engine produces 19 HP less power than Honda Prelude, but torque is 24 NM more than Honda Prelude. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.5 | 10.4 | |
The Honda Prelude is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chrysler Sebring consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda Prelude, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Sebring could require 165 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 520 km in combined cycle | 570 km in combined cycle | |
660 km on highway | 760 km on highway | ||
Honda Prelude gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
Engine production duration: | 12 years | 11 years | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.76 m | 4.54 m | |
Width: | 1.77 m | 1.75 m | |
Height: | 1.30 m | 1.32 m | |
Chrysler Sebring is larger, but slightly lower. Chrysler Sebring is 22 cm longer than the Honda Prelude, 2 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Sebring is 2 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 370 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | no data | 11 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`200 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 1800 | 1200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
|
Honda Prelude has
| |