Chrysler Sebring 1994 vs Honda Civic 1996
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 147 HP | 105 HP | |
Torque: | 174 NM | 140 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 11.4 seconds | |
Chrysler Sebring is more dynamic to drive. Chrysler Sebring engine produces 42 HP more power than Honda Civic, whereas torque is 34 NM more than Honda Civic. Thanks to more power Chrysler Sebring reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.6 | 8.1 | |
The Honda Civic is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chrysler Sebring consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda Civic, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Sebring could require 75 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 45 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 690 km in combined cycle | 550 km in combined cycle | |
780 km on highway | 700 km on highway | ||
Chrysler Sebring gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.76 m | 4.46 m | |
Width: | 1.77 m | 1.70 m | |
Height: | 1.30 m | 1.38 m | |
Chrysler Sebring is larger, but lower. Chrysler Sebring is 30 cm longer than the Honda Civic, 7 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Sebring is 8 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 370 litres | 405 litres | |
Honda Civic has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Chrysler Sebring has 35 litres less trunk space than the Honda Civic. This could mean that the Chrysler Sebring uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
Turning diameter: | no data | 10 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`550 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | above average | |
Average price (€): | 1800 | 1200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Sebring has
|
Honda Civic has
| |