Chrysler Sebring 2000 vs SAAB 9-3 1999
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 203 HP | 205 HP | |
| Torque: | 278 NM | 280 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 seconds | 7.3 seconds | |
|
SAAB 9-3 is a more dynamic driving. Chrysler Sebring engine produces 2 HP less power than SAAB 9-3, whereas torque is 2 NM less than SAAB 9-3. Due to the lower power, Chrysler Sebring reaches 100 km/h speed 2.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.1 | 9.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.0 l/100km | 10.0 l/100km | |
|
The SAAB 9-3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Chrysler Sebring consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the SAAB 9-3, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Sebring could require 165 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 64 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 610 km in combined cycle | 710 km in combined cycle | |
| 730 km on highway | 960 km on highway | ||
| 620 km with real consumption | 640 km with real consumption | ||
| SAAB 9-3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.83 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.37 m | 1.43 m | |
|
Chrysler Sebring is larger, but lower. Chrysler Sebring is 20 cm longer than the SAAB 9-3, 8 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Sebring is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 460 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.5 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`600 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 3000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Sebring has
|
SAAB 9-3 has
| |