Chrysler Sebring 2000 vs SAAB 9-3 2000
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 203 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 278 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 seconds | 10.4 seconds | |
|
Chrysler Sebring is more dynamic to drive. Chrysler Sebring engine produces 53 HP more power than SAAB 9-3, whereas torque is 38 NM more than SAAB 9-3. Thanks to more power Chrysler Sebring reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.1 | 10.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.0 l/100km | 10.1 l/100km | |
|
By specification Chrysler Sebring consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the SAAB 9-3, which means that by driving the Chrysler Sebring over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chrysler Sebring consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the SAAB 9-3. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 64 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 610 km in combined cycle | 620 km in combined cycle | |
| 730 km on highway | 850 km on highway | ||
| 620 km with real consumption | 630 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.83 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.37 m | 1.44 m | |
|
Chrysler Sebring is larger, but lower. Chrysler Sebring is 19 cm longer than the SAAB 9-3, 8 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Sebring is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 460 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.5 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`600 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Sebring has
|
| |