Chrysler Sebring 2000 vs Renault Megane 2000
Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 3.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 203 HP | 140 HP | |
Torque: | 278 NM | 200 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 seconds | 8.6 seconds | |
Chrysler Sebring engine produces 63 HP more power than Renault Megane, whereas torque is 78 NM more than Renault Megane. Despite the higher power, Chrysler Sebring reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.1 | 7.6 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 10.0 l/100km | 7.7 l/100km | |
The Renault Megane is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Chrysler Sebring consumes 2.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Megane, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Sebring could require 375 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chrysler Sebring consumes 2.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Megane. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 60 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 610 km in combined cycle | 780 km in combined cycle | |
730 km on highway | 980 km on highway | ||
620 km with real consumption | 770 km with real consumption | ||
Renault Megane gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.83 m | 3.97 m | |
Width: | 1.79 m | 1.70 m | |
Height: | 1.37 m | 1.37 m | |
Chrysler Sebring is larger, but slightly lower. Chrysler Sebring is 86 cm longer than the Renault Megane, 9 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 460 litres | 288 litres | |
Chrysler Sebring has more luggage capacity. Chrysler Sebring has 172 litres more trunk space than the Renault Megane. | |||
Turning diameter: | no data | 10.5 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`555 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | average | |
Average price (€): | 2000 | 800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Sebring has
|
Renault Megane has
| |