Chrysler Sebring 2000 vs Peugeot 407 2005
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 3.0 Petrol | 3.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 203 HP | 211 HP | |
Torque: | 278 NM | 290 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 seconds | 8.7 seconds | |
Peugeot 407 is a more dynamic driving. Chrysler Sebring engine produces 8 HP less power than Peugeot 407, whereas torque is 12 NM less than Peugeot 407. Due to the lower power, Chrysler Sebring reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.1 | 10.2 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 10.0 l/100km | 10.9 l/100km | |
The Chrysler Sebring is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Chrysler Sebring consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 407, which means that by driving the Chrysler Sebring over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chrysler Sebring consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 407. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 67 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 610 km in combined cycle | 650 km in combined cycle | |
730 km on highway | 1090 km on highway | ||
620 km with real consumption | 610 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.83 m | 4.82 m | |
Width: | 1.79 m | 1.87 m | |
Height: | 1.37 m | 1.40 m | |
Chrysler Sebring is 1 cm longer than the Peugeot 407, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Chrysler Sebring is 4 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 460 litres | 400 litres | |
Chrysler Sebring has more luggage capacity. Chrysler Sebring has 60 litres more trunk space than the Peugeot 407. | |||
Turning diameter: | no data | 11.7 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`020 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | low | |
Average price (€): | 2000 | 2400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Sebring has
|
Peugeot 407 has
| |