Chrysler Sebring 2000 vs Mitsubishi Eclipse 1999
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 203 HP | 147 HP | |
| Torque: | 278 NM | 214 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Chrysler Sebring engine produces 56 HP more power than Mitsubishi Eclipse, whereas torque is 64 NM more than Mitsubishi Eclipse. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.1 | 8.9 | |
|
The Mitsubishi Eclipse is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chrysler Sebring consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Eclipse, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Sebring could require 180 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 62 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 610 km in combined cycle | 690 km in combined cycle | |
| 730 km on highway | 810 km on highway | ||
| Mitsubishi Eclipse gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.83 m | 4.46 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.37 m | 1.31 m | |
|
Chrysler Sebring is larger. Chrysler Sebring is 38 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Eclipse, 4 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Sebring is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 460 litres | 480 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Chrysler Sebring has 20 litres less trunk space than the Mitsubishi Eclipse. This could mean that the Chrysler Sebring uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`918 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 3600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Sebring has
|
Mitsubishi Eclipse has
| |