Chrysler Sebring 2000 vs Toyota Celica 1999
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 203 HP | 143 HP | |
| Torque: | 278 NM | 172 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 seconds | 8.7 seconds | |
| Chrysler Sebring engine produces 60 HP more power than Toyota Celica, whereas torque is 106 NM more than Toyota Celica. Despite the higher power, Chrysler Sebring reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.1 | 7.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.0 l/100km | 7.9 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota Celica is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Chrysler Sebring consumes 2.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Celica, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Sebring could require 360 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chrysler Sebring consumes 2.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Celica. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 610 km in combined cycle | 710 km in combined cycle | |
| 730 km on highway | 880 km on highway | ||
| 620 km with real consumption | 690 km with real consumption | ||
| Toyota Celica gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Toyota Celica 1999 1.8 engine: The 1ZZ-FE engine is more advanced, lighter, and simpler than its predecessor, emphasizing fuel efficiency and output. However, these improvements have come at the cost of reduced durability compared to earlier cast-iron engines. The engine block features an open-deck cooling design for easier production and lower ... More about Toyota Celica 1999 1.8 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.83 m | 4.34 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.37 m | 1.32 m | |
|
Chrysler Sebring is larger. Chrysler Sebring is 49 cm longer than the Toyota Celica, 5 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Sebring is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 460 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`200 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Sebring has
|
Toyota Celica has
| |