Chrysler Sebring 2000 vs Toyota Celica 2002
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 203 HP | 192 HP | |
| Torque: | 278 NM | 180 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 seconds | 7.4 seconds | |
| Chrysler Sebring engine produces 11 HP more power than Toyota Celica, whereas torque is 98 NM more than Toyota Celica. Despite the higher power, Chrysler Sebring reaches 100 km/h speed 2.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.1 | 8.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.0 l/100km | 8.6 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota Celica is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Chrysler Sebring consumes 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Celica, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Sebring could require 255 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chrysler Sebring consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Celica. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 610 km in combined cycle | 650 km in combined cycle | |
| 730 km on highway | 830 km on highway | ||
| 620 km with real consumption | 630 km with real consumption | ||
| Toyota Celica gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.83 m | 4.35 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.37 m | 1.32 m | |
|
Chrysler Sebring is larger. Chrysler Sebring is 48 cm longer than the Toyota Celica, 5 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Sebring is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 460 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`200 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 2400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Sebring has
|
Toyota Celica has
| |