Chrysler Sebring 2000 vs Honda Prelude 1996
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 203 HP | 133 HP | |
| Torque: | 278 NM | 179 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 seconds | 9.2 seconds | |
| Chrysler Sebring engine produces 70 HP more power than Honda Prelude, whereas torque is 99 NM more than Honda Prelude. Despite the higher power, Chrysler Sebring reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.1 | 9.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.0 l/100km | 9.0 l/100km | |
|
The Honda Prelude is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Chrysler Sebring consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda Prelude, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Sebring could require 135 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chrysler Sebring consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda Prelude. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 610 km in combined cycle | 650 km in combined cycle | |
| 730 km on highway | 820 km on highway | ||
| 620 km with real consumption | 660 km with real consumption | ||
| Honda Prelude gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.83 m | 4.54 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.37 m | 1.32 m | |
|
Chrysler Sebring is larger. Chrysler Sebring is 29 cm longer than the Honda Prelude, 4 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Sebring is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 460 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`200 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Sebring has
|
Honda Prelude has
| |