Chrysler Sebring 2000 vs Honda Civic 1996
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 203 HP | 105 HP | |
| Torque: | 278 NM | 140 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 seconds | 10.1 seconds | |
| Chrysler Sebring engine produces 98 HP more power than Honda Civic, whereas torque is 138 NM more than Honda Civic. Thanks to more power Chrysler Sebring reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.1 | 7.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.0 l/100km | 7.5 l/100km | |
|
The Honda Civic is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Chrysler Sebring consumes 3.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda Civic, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Sebring could require 465 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chrysler Sebring consumes 2.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda Civic. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 610 km in combined cycle | 640 km in combined cycle | |
| 730 km on highway | 750 km on highway | ||
| 620 km with real consumption | 600 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.83 m | 4.46 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.37 m | 1.38 m | |
|
Chrysler Sebring is larger, but slightly lower. Chrysler Sebring is 37 cm longer than the Honda Civic, 9 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Sebring is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 460 litres | 405 litres | |
|
Chrysler Sebring has more luggage capacity. Chrysler Sebring has 55 litres more trunk space than the Honda Civic. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`550 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Sebring has
|
Honda Civic has
| |