Chrysler Sebring 2000 vs Honda Civic 2003
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Petrol | 1.7 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 203 HP | 125 HP | |
| Torque: | 278 NM | 154 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 seconds | 11.1 seconds | |
|
Chrysler Sebring is more dynamic to drive. Chrysler Sebring engine produces 78 HP more power than Honda Civic, whereas torque is 124 NM more than Honda Civic. Thanks to more power Chrysler Sebring reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.1 | 7.3 | |
|
The Honda Civic is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chrysler Sebring consumes 2.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda Civic, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Sebring could require 420 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 610 km in combined cycle | 680 km in combined cycle | |
| 730 km on highway | 870 km on highway | ||
| Honda Civic gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.83 m | 4.48 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.37 m | 1.40 m | |
|
Chrysler Sebring is larger, but slightly lower. Chrysler Sebring is 35 cm longer than the Honda Civic, 10 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Sebring is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 460 litres | 441 litres | |
| Chrysler Sebring has 19 litres more trunk space than the Honda Civic. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`590 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Sebring has
|
Honda Civic has
| |