Chrysler Sebring 2000 vs Chevrolet Camaro 1997
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Petrol | 3.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 203 HP | 203 HP | |
| Torque: | 278 NM | 305 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 seconds | 8.5 seconds | |
|
Chevrolet Camaro is a more dynamic driving. Chrysler Sebring and Chevrolet Camaro have the same engine power, but Chrysler Sebring torque is 27 NM less than Chevrolet Camaro. Chrysler Sebring reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.1 | 10.0 | |
| Chrysler Sebring consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Camaro, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Sebring could require 15 litres more fuel. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Chrysler Sebring) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Chevrolet Camaro) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.83 m | 4.92 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.37 m | 1.30 m | |
|
Chrysler Sebring is smaller, but higher. Chrysler Sebring is 9 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Camaro, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Chrysler Sebring is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 460 litres | 923 litres | |
|
Chevrolet Camaro has more luggage space. Chrysler Sebring has 463 litres less trunk space than the Chevrolet Camaro. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`872 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 5600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Sebring has
|
Chevrolet Camaro has
| |