Chrysler Sebring 2001 vs SAAB 9-3 1998
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 147 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 214 NM | 210 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 seconds | 11 seconds | |
|
Chrysler Sebring is more dynamic to drive. Chrysler Sebring engine produces 3 HP less power than SAAB 9-3, but torque is 4 NM more than SAAB 9-3. Despite less power, Chrysler Sebring reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.4 | 10.2 | |
| Chrysler Sebring consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the SAAB 9-3, which means that by driving the Chrysler Sebring over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 68 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 660 km in combined cycle | |
| 730 km on highway | 890 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.83 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.37 m | 1.43 m | |
|
Chrysler Sebring is larger, but lower. Chrysler Sebring is 20 cm longer than the SAAB 9-3, 8 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Sebring is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 460 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.5 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`600 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 3200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Sebring has
|
| |