Chrysler Sebring 2001 vs Alfa Romeo GT 2004
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 147 HP | 165 HP | |
| Torque: | 214 NM | 206 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 seconds | 8.7 seconds | |
|
Alfa Romeo GT is a more dynamic driving. Chrysler Sebring engine produces 18 HP less power than Alfa Romeo GT, but torque is 8 NM more than Alfa Romeo GT. Due to the lower power, Chrysler Sebring reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.4 | 8.7 | |
|
The Alfa Romeo GT is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chrysler Sebring consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Alfa Romeo GT, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Sebring could require 105 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 63 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
| 730 km on highway | 920 km on highway | ||
| Alfa Romeo GT gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.83 m | 4.49 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.37 m | 1.36 m | |
|
Chrysler Sebring is larger. Chrysler Sebring is 34 cm longer than the Alfa Romeo GT, 3 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 460 litres | 320 litres | |
|
Chrysler Sebring has more luggage capacity. Chrysler Sebring has 140 litres more trunk space than the Alfa Romeo GT. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.5 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`750 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 2400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Sebring has
|
Alfa Romeo GT has
| |