Chrysler Sebring 2001 vs Volvo S80 2003
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.7 Petrol | 2.9 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 203 HP | 196 HP | |
| Torque: | 262 NM | 280 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 seconds | 8.9 seconds | |
|
Volvo S80 is a more dynamic driving. Chrysler Sebring engine produces 7 HP more power than Volvo S80, but torque is 18 NM less than Volvo S80. Despite the higher power, Chrysler Sebring reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.6 | 11.0 | |
| Chrysler Sebring consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S80, which means that by driving the Chrysler Sebring over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 560 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
| 730 km on highway | 950 km on highway | ||
| Volvo S80 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.84 m | 4.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.43 m | |
| Chrysler Sebring is 2 cm longer than the Volvo S80, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Chrysler Sebring is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 455 litres | 440 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1106 litres | |
| Chrysler Sebring has 15 litres more trunk space than the Volvo S80. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Sebring is 0.8 metres less than that of the Volvo S80, which means Chrysler Sebring can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`990 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Sebring has
|
Volvo S80 has
| |