Chrysler Sebring 2001 vs Volvo S80 2003
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.7 Petrol | 2.4 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 203 HP | 130 HP | |
| Torque: | 262 NM | 280 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 seconds | 12 seconds | |
|
Chrysler Sebring is more dynamic to drive. Chrysler Sebring engine produces 73 HP more power than Volvo S80, but torque is 18 NM less than Volvo S80. Thanks to more power Chrysler Sebring reaches 100 km/h speed 2.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.6 | 7.8 | |
|
The Volvo S80 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chrysler Sebring consumes 2.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S80, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Sebring could require 420 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 560 km in combined cycle | 890 km in combined cycle | |
| 730 km on highway | 1140 km on highway | ||
| Volvo S80 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 460'000 km | 560'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Volvo S80 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 13 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Chrysler 300C, Chrysler 300M, Dodge Intrepid | Used also on Volvo S60 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Chrysler Sebring might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.84 m | 4.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.43 m | |
| Chrysler Sebring is 2 cm longer than the Volvo S80, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Chrysler Sebring is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 455 litres | 440 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1106 litres | |
| Chrysler Sebring has 15 litres more trunk space than the Volvo S80. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Sebring is 0.2 metres more than that of the Volvo S80. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`990 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Sebring has
|
Volvo S80 has
| |