Chrysler Sebring 2001 vs Jaguar XJ 2003
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.7 Petrol | 3.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 203 HP | 240 HP | |
| Torque: | 262 NM | 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 seconds | 8.1 seconds | |
|
Jaguar XJ is a more dynamic driving. Chrysler Sebring engine produces 37 HP less power than Jaguar XJ, whereas torque is 38 NM less than Jaguar XJ. Due to the lower power, Chrysler Sebring reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.6 | 10.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.3 l/100km | 11.1 l/100km | |
|
The Chrysler Sebring is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Chrysler Sebring consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jaguar XJ, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Sebring could require 15 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Chrysler Sebring consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jaguar XJ. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 85 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 560 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
| 730 km on highway | 1100 km on highway | ||
| 580 km with real consumption | 760 km with real consumption | ||
| Jaguar XJ gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Chrysler Sebring) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Jaguar XJ) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.84 m | 5.09 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.45 m | |
|
Chrysler Sebring is smaller. Chrysler Sebring is 25 cm shorter than the Jaguar XJ, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Chrysler Sebring is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 455 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Sebring is 0.5 metres less than that of the Jaguar XJ, which means Chrysler Sebring can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`990 | 1`900 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 9800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Sebring has
|
Jaguar XJ has
| |