Chrysler Sebring 2001 vs Chevrolet Malibu 1997
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.7 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 203 HP | 152 HP | |
| Torque: | 262 NM | 210 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 seconds | 9.5 seconds | |
|
Chrysler Sebring is more dynamic to drive. Chrysler Sebring engine produces 51 HP more power than Chevrolet Malibu, whereas torque is 52 NM more than Chevrolet Malibu. Thanks to more power Chrysler Sebring reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.6 | 9.0 | |
|
The Chevrolet Malibu is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chrysler Sebring consumes 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Malibu, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Sebring could require 240 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 57 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 560 km in combined cycle | 630 km in combined cycle | |
| 730 km on highway | 770 km on highway | ||
| Chevrolet Malibu gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.84 m | 4.84 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.43 m | |
|
Chrysler Sebring is larger, but lower. Chrysler Sebring and Chevrolet Malibu are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 455 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 464 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Sebring is 0.1 metres more than that of the Chevrolet Malibu. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`990 kg | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Sebring has
|
Chevrolet Malibu has
| |